Criminal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Criminal - Essay Example According to Pell v. Procunier(1974), it was held that inmates could not have personal or face-to-face interviews with media personnel (Pollock, 2011). This prohibition is irrespective of whether the interview is peaceful and without threats. Inmates are thus advised to use other alternative methods of communication other than personal interviews. In Procunier v. Martinez, communication with inmates is highly prohibited and prison wardens have an obligation to ensure that this constitutional law is followed. In most prisons, there are prisoners who have been assigned the duty to ensure that law of prison is followed and who also speaks on behalf of prisoners. The warden in this case, has no other option but to make it known to the prisoners that the law does not allow personal interviews with the media personnel. The warden should also agree with the inmates’ clerks to maintain order in the prison. Part 2; Several inmates confined to a disciplinary segregation unit submit letters to the Warden of a correctional facility, indicating that they want to attend mandatory religious services, on a significant holy day of their chosen religion; do you have to allow them to attend? If not, why? According to May v. Sheahan, an inmate is entitled to exercise freely his religious practices as outlined in the Free Exercise Clause (Pollock, 2011). Prison regulation that does not adhere to this clause can only be upheld if it is reasonable under legitimate interests. Thus, all prisoners including those in the disciplinary unit have the right to exercise their faith. These rights should be protected as they help in the transformation process. Religion contributes a lot in strengthening their morals and in changing their criminal lifestyle to that of a morally upright person who has the ability to make ethical decisions. In relation to this, prison warden should allow the inmates to practice their faith freely and to access religious materials concerning their

Hamlets negative perception of women in Shakespeares epic Hamlet Essay

Hamlets negative perception of women in Shakespeares epic Hamlet - Essay Example Leaving vulnerable roles for women and giving them no personal agency are the kinds of things for which Shakespeare has attracted much criticism over the years. Hamlet is the name of one such Shakespearean tragedy which clearly is a critically acclaimed success, but keeping in pattern with its predecessors, female characters in this play also are inferior to their male counterparts. Strangely enough, women are often introduced and portrayed as antagonists to the leading hero of the play who have either done something wrong to infuriate the male hero or are just simply misinterpreted and treated negatively. In Hamlet too, both leading female characters, Gertrude and Opehlia, are portrayed in a negative light. Both are singularly vulnerable compared to other main male characters and have no personal agency. It is suggested that Ophelia contributes to Hamlet’s anguish by betraying him on her father’s insistence, but actually Hamlet proves to be the source of her pain. The hotheaded aggressive hero of the tragedy causes Ophelia more emotional distress than she could ever cause to him and also contributes to her tragic demise. The purpose of this essay is to augment this argument that Hamlet has very negative attitudes towards women because he perceives them in a markedly flawed manner. The following discussion will explore and prove this argument in special reference to one female character, Ophelia. Prince Hamlet’s anger is made emphatic by the succession of Claudius to the throne whom he believes to be the murderer of his real father. To cap the matters, Gertrude also marries Claudius. However, irony is that she is not aware of the fact that the man she is marrying is the murderer of her husband. But, Hamlet still blames her vehemently believing he is betrayed by his mother. His personal ideology and belief about women is quite degrading and insulting, but he does not acknowledge this great weakness in his personality. According to Freud†™s psychoanalytic perspective on personality, myriad experiences of youth or early family life have huge repercussions and play a momentous role in structuring a road-map for the future. Freud’s biological mother was quite beautiful and when once, he inadvertently saw her naked, everlasting impression of attraction and love was casted on his mind. His positive impression of women and the way he acknowledges their beauty and intelligence in his work stems from that early experience (Friedman and Schustack 70). In the same way, the bitter experience Hamlet shared with his mother in the form of her agreeing to marry Claudius cultivates this everlasting belief in his heart that all women are traitorous creatures who are not to be loved, appreciated, and believed. This belief structures a roadmap for his future life too which is evident in the way he goes on to treat Ophelia, another important woman in his life. Hamlet’s rancorous relationship with his mother develops emo tional deficits in him. This is because the kind of attachment he has with Gertrude as a son affects him deeply and shapes his behaviors. He clearly does not share healthy cumulative experiences with Gertrude, due to which he ends up developing a warped sense of attachment and psychological connectedness with Ophelia. Gertrude is not to be blamed here, of course, for negatively influencing her son. This is Hamlet’s innate disposition to perceive things negatively taking them for what they are not in reality. This is why his relationship with Ophelia is so affectionless. A long journey consisting of many manipulative schemes is undertaken by Hamlet to reach his objectives and seek revenge on his enemies. One of those